Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Edward Spagel, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD J. SPAGEL, JR., PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Debtor:
TAYLOR, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT.
Michael Williams v. Sheriff, Telfair County Georgia
as 23-13905
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL OSHEY WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF, TELFAIR COUNTY GEORGIA
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Michael Williams v. Sheriff, Telfair County Georgia
as 23-13136
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL OSHEY WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
SIM DAVIDSON and SHERIFF, TELFAIR COUNTY GEORGIA
Williams v. Hartshorn et al
as 2:2023cv02194
Plaintiff:
Michael L Williams
Defendant:
Patrick Hartshorn, Kevin Maskel and Vermilion County Jail Public Safety Building
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00327
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Williams v. Davidson
as 3:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Michael Oshey Williams and John Willie McRae
Defendant:
Sheriff Sim Davidson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Augusta State Prison et al
as 1:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Michael David Williams
Defendant:
Augusta State Prison, Warden Forth, Deputy Warden Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. SPAGEL et al
as 1:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD SPAGEL, OFFICER PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00797
Plaintiff:
Michael W Williams
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Dart
as 1:2021cv00772
Plaintiff:
Michael Jerome Williams
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
