Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Ford v. Stone et al
as 5:2024ct03001
Plaintiff:
Jarred J. Ford
Defendant:
Keith Stone, Sheriff Bond Surety, Major Allen Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2021ct03348
Plaintiff:
Timothy R. Cox
Defendant:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURNER v. RUPSKA et al
as 2:2018cv00420
Defendant:
DOUG MCGUIRK, A. RUPSKA, C. DANIELS and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. TURNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scott Cook v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 14-16769
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SCOTT TROY COOK
Defendant - Appellant:
MATTHEW CATE, Current Director of CDCR, F. JUAQUEZ, Current Warden at PBSP, G. D. LEWIS, Previous Warden at PBSP and others
Lee v. Cox et al
as 3:2014cv02472
Defendant:
R Cox, P Roberts, Wollerson and others
Plaintiff:
Cleveland L Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Cox et al
as 5:2014cv05256
Defendant:
R. Cox, P. Roberts, Wollerson and others
Plaintiff:
Cleveland L. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. CORRECTIONAL OFC. PIRELLI et al
as 1:2014cv01923
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
PIRELLI, CUCCINI, UNKNOWN CORRECTIONAL OFC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROUDABUSH v. CORRECTIONAL OFC. PIRELLI et al
as 1:2013cv01172
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFC. PIRELLI, CORRECTIONAL OFC. CUCCINI, UNKNOWN (TO BE NAMED) CORRECTIONAL OFC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irvin Tatum v. T. Puget, et al
as 12-15821
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IRVIN T. TATUM
Defendant - Appellee:
T. PUGET, D. BRADBURY, R. COX and others
Defendant:
D. MARVIN, M. COOK and J. HIRAI
Cook v. Cate et al
as 5:2011cv06581
Plaintiff:
Scott Troy Cook
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, F. Juaquez, G. D. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
