Cases 1 - 10 of 718
BAKER v. ASHONG et al
as 1:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
LINDSEY DIANE BAKER
Defendant:
HELENA ASHONG, HOPE DE KREF, KATHY NICHOLAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Sealy
as 2:2024cv01120
Plaintiff:
Don Lewis
Defendant:
Sherri Sealy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarence Britten v. Anthony Wills, et al
as 24-1547
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE BRITTEN
Defendant:
ANTHONY WILLS, Warden, CARRI MORRIS, Leading Social Worker, Menard CC and SHERRI BUETTNER, MHP, Menard CC
Banks, Chris v. Well Path et al
as 0:2024cv60426
Plaintiff:
Chris Banks
Defendant:
Well Path, Carolina Hayward, Patricia Keathlem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Streeter v. Wright et al
as 5:2024ct03045
Plaintiff:
Faith Sherrie Streeter
Defendant:
Tracey Wright, Ms. Lyons and Officer Morrisey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Guidroz et al
as 2:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lee Patterson
Defendant:
Zach Guidroz, Garrett Douglas, Laura Stogner and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COOK v. MERSHON et al
as 1:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
EDWARD CHARLES COOK, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN L. MERSHON, MARTIAL KNIESER, SHERRI WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMS v. DENMEN et al
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMS
Defendant:
DENMEN, LEE, SHERRY DON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shively #167606 v. Washington et al
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Gordon Lee Shively #167606
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Sandra Maes, Marti Kay Sherry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon-Davis v. Kayira et al
as 3:2023cv03363
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Dixon-Davis
Defendant:
Francis Kayira, Sherry Simmons, Ismail Qattash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
