Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ragland v. Vance County et al
as 5:2022ct03409
Plaintiff:
Kim Ragland and Kenneth Watkins
Defendant:
Vance County, City of Henderson, W.E. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zeckeya Perry v. Ivory McDaniel, et al
as 22-1981
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Zeckeya Perry
Defendant / Appellee:
Ivory T. McDaniel, Lieutenant, Shift Supervisor, Marshall Dale Reed, Chief Deputy Director, Wendy Kelley, Previous Director and others
MCDANIELS v. MCKUTCHINS et al
as 4:2021cv00132
Plaintiff:
DE'RONTE T. MCDANIELS
Defendant:
MCKUTCHINS, COGAN, GRUBE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz v. Richards et al
as 3:2021cv00859
Defendant:
S. Gates, B. Woods, T. McDaniel and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Jesse Cruz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Helloms v. McDaniel et al
as 5:2019cv00146
Defendant:
Adam Vick, Anthony Lugo, Ivory T McDaniel and others
Plaintiff:
Charles D Helloms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniels v. Alepandr et al
as 1:2019cv02286
Plaintiff:
John T. McDaniels
Defendant:
Capin Alepandr, The Hole D.O.C. and Captain Luna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDaniels v. Alepandr et al
as 1:2019cv01361
Plaintiff:
John T. McDaniels
Defendant:
Luna, Capin Alepandr and The Hole D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. KRUEGER et al
as 2:2017cv00467
Defendant:
CHARLES A. DANIELS, JANE/JOHN DOES, JEFFREY E. KRUEGER and others
Plaintiff:
LEN DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thelma Williams, Jr. v. James McDermott, et al
as 14-3332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Thelma Williams, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
James McDermott, Sergeant, Malvern Quachita River Unit, Pruitt, Sergeant, Malvern Quachita River Unit, Reed, Warden, Malvern Quachita River Unit and others
Williams v. McDermott et al
as 4:2014cv00555
Plaintiff:
Thelma Williams
Defendant:
James McDermott, Pruitt, Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
