Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Welsh v. McLane, et al
as 5:2023cv00053
Petitioner:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Respondent:
Marsha McLane, Chris Greenwalt, Michael Searchy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Welsh v. McLane et al
as 1:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Marsha McLane, Chris Greenwalt, Michael Searchy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Arizona Community Protection and Treatment Center et al
as 2:2020cv01343
Defendant:
Arizona Community Protection and Treatment Center and Shanda Payne
Plaintiff:
Timothy W Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daywitt v. Harpstead et al
as 0:2019cv02632
Defendant:
Justin Joslin, Brian Ninneman, Ryan Fahland and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth S. Daywitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopkins et al
as 1:2018cv00652
Plaintiff:
Michele Edmark, Leonard J. Hopkins and Deborah Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hopkins v. NH State Prison for Men, Warden, et al
as 1:2018cv00653
Plaintiff:
Leonard Hopkins
Respondent:
Deborah Robinson and NH State Prison for Men, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Charles Robinson v. Leslie Sziebert, et al
as 18-35308
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LESLIE SZIEBERT, Dr. Washington State Special Commitment Center Chief Medical Director, JOHN DOES, 1-25 and JANE DOES, 1-25
Stabnow v. Johnson-Piper et al
as 0:2016cv02648
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Stabnow
Defendant:
Emily Johnson Piper , Shelby Richardson , Nancy Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Scaturo et al
as 1:2016cv02311
Plaintiff:
Shawn M. Robinson
Defendant:
Holly Scaturo, Kimberly Poholchuk, Cynthia Helff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Strong
as 3:2016cv05534
Plaintiff:
Mark Robinson
Defendant:
Mark Strong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
