Other Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
United States of America v. 15418 Hampshire Lane, Savage, Minnesota et al
as 0:2022cv00154
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 15418 Hampshire Lane, Savage, Minnesota, 5594 Candy Cove Trail SE, Prior Lake, Minnesota, 5604 Candy Cove Trail SE, Prior Lake, Minnesota and others
Claimant: Abdiaziz Farah, Salim Said, Abdi Nur Salah and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
United States of America v. Currency $31,414 et al
as 2:2018cv12861
Defendant: Currency $76,879.61 from JP Morgan Chase Bank Account No. 965840820, Currency $2,559.71 from JP Morgan Chase Bank Account No. 2974580629, Currency $885.07 from JP Morgan Chase Bank Account No. 786002154 and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Claimant: FARES YASIN, Nura Yasin, Michigan Home Visiting Physicians and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. $81,963.74 from American First National Bank Account No. 1050809603 et al
as 1:2017cv02894
Defendant: $81,963.74 from American First National Bank Account No. 1050809603, All Funds up to $50,000.00 held in Intrust Bank Account No. 99880485, $97,083.00 from Hanmi Bank Account No. 1904739 and others
Plaintiff: USA
Claimant: Raza Ahmmed , SGP Trading Inc , Fakhruddin Dean Gheewalla and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. SIX THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED SEVENTY TWO DOLLARS AND SEVENTY THREE CENTS ($6,872.73) IN FUNDS FROM ACCOUNT #XXXXXX2357 IN THE NAME OF AMNSS INC./DESHI BAZAR AT PNC BANK; et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv14023
Defendant: SIX THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED SEVENTY TWO DOLLARS AND SEVENTY THREE CENTS ($6,872.73) IN FUNDS FROM ACCOUNT #XXXXXX2357 IN THE NAME OF AMNSS INC./DESHI BAZAR AT PNC BANK;, THREE THOUSAND SEVEN DOLLARS AND EIGHTY THREE CENTS ($3,007.83) IN FUNDS FROM ACCOUNT #XXXXX8075 IN THE NAME OF AMNSS INC. AT PNC BANK and FORTY THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED FIFTY SIX DOLLARS ($40,656.00) IN U.S. CURRENCY
Plaintiff: United States of America
Claimant: Nazir Ahmed , Mustak Ahmed and Ali Ahmed
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. $17,242.00 in U.S. Currency We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01295
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $17,242.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant: Adel Ahmed Fadel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. $91,639.70 in U.S. Currency
as 1:2013cv03541
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $91,639.70 in U.S. Currency
Claimant: Zaheer Ahmed , Dermik and Aydin LLC , Dermik Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CONTENTS OF A WELLS FARGO BANK CHECKING ACCOUNT #2000025878888, UNDER THE NAME OF PANAMA CITY WHOLESALE SUPPLY, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv00076
Defendant: CONTENTS OF A WELLS FARGO BANK CHECKING ACCOUNT #2000025878888, UNDER THE NAME OF PANAMA CITY WHOLESALE SUPPLY, INC.
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant: PANAMA CITY WHOLESALE SUPPLY INC and EHAB AHMED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
United States of America v. Tahir et al
as 4:2012cv00078
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Ahmed Tahir and Fatima Tahir
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2023
Case name not on file
as 1:2008at00261
Movant: Assma Ali, Yosra Ali, Somayah Ali and others
Defendant: United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
United States of America et al v. $105,278.63 Seized from First Intercontinental Bank, et al
as 1:2007cv00565
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $105,278.63 Seized from First Intercontinental Bank, $11,160.43 Seized from J.P. Morgan/Chase, $116,921.97 Seized from J.P. Morgan/Chase and others
Claimant: Semira Alamin, Tekle Russom and MOHAMED ALAMIN AHMED
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 5317 Search and Forfeiture of Monetary Instruments

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?