Cases 11 - 20 of 85
Goodman v. De Wafelbakkers LLC
as 4:2019cv00427
Plaintiff:
William Goodman
Defendant:
De Wafelbakkers LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Goodman, James et al v. Restaurant Depot, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00399
Plaintiff:
Dominic Schroeder and James Goodman
Defendant:
Jetro Holdings LLC and Restaurant Depot, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Goodman v. Mid South Waffles, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00705
Defendant:
Mid South Waffles, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alvin Goodman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Goodman v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
as 3:2017cv06649
Plaintiff:
Jerald Goodman
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Stuart et al
as 1:2017cv00107
Plaintiff:
Frank Stuart , Jason Adams , Michael Barnes and others
Defendant:
Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Parr et al v. Directv, LLC et al
as 0:2017cv03424
Defendant:
Directv, LLC, Multiband Field Services, Inc., Multiband Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Parr , Jeffery Adams , Todd Frank and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Goodman v. Honeywell International, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00860
Plaintiff:
Pamela Goodman
Defendant:
Steven White, Theresa Hammond, Honeywell International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Goodman v. Inter-Continental Hotels Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00534
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Goodman
Defendant:
Inter-Continental Hotels Corporation, Intercontinental Hotels Group Resources, Inc., IHG Management (Maryland), LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Greene et al v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2017cv00026
Plaintiff:
Shekeera Greene , Thomas Houff , Michael Milner and others
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Howell v. Goodman Networks Incorporated
as 2:2017cv02018
Plaintiff:
Matthew Howell
Defendant:
Goodman Networks Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
