Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Teixeira v. Town of Clinton, MA
as 4:2023cv40141
Plaintiff:
Alexis Teixeira
Defendant:
Town of Clinton, MA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Nelson v. Town of Westminster et al
as 4:2023cv40069
Plaintiff:
Amy Nelson
Defendant:
Town of Westminster, Chief Ralph LeBlanc, in his individual and official capacity and Chief Ralph LeBlanc
Mineo v. Town of Hempstead et al
as 2:2022cv04092
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mineo
Defendant:
Town of Hempstead, John Rottkamp, John Novello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Landolfi v. North Haven
as 3:2022cv00770
Plaintiff:
Josephine Landolfi
Defendant:
Town of North Haven
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612 Family & Medical Leave Act
Kruppstadt v. Town and Country Super Market, Inc.
as 6:2022cv03088
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Kruppstadt
Defendant:
Town and Country Super Market, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Bankhead v. Sahuarita, Town of
as 4:2021cv00517
Plaintiff:
Teri Bankhead
Defendant:
Sahuarita, Town of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA: Family and Medical Leave Act (Findings and Purposes)
Towne v. Tri-County Community Action Program
as 1:2021cv00682
Plaintiff:
Carolyn A Towne and Carolyn Towne
Defendant:
Tri-County Community Action Program, Inc. and Tri-County Community Action Program
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family
Peterson v. Waterford
as 3:2021cv00332
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Peterson
Defendant:
Town of Waterford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Lubus v. Redding
as 3:2021cv00166
Plaintiff:
Mark Lubus and Mark S. Lubus
Defendant:
Town of Redding
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612
Watson v. The Town of Mint Hill et al
as 3:2020cv00720
Defendant:
The Town of Mint Hill and Mint Hill Fire Prevention Bureau, Inc. f/k/a Mint Hill Volunteer Fire Department
Plaintiff:
Marguerite Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
