Cases 1 - 10 of 14,024
Roth v. Greif Inc
as 3:2024cv01514
Plaintiff:
Aaron Roth
Defendant:
Greif Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
GRIFFITH v. TILSON TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT INC
as 2:2024cv00329
Defendant:
TILSON TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT INC
Plaintiff:
EVAN H GRIFFITH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave Act
ROBINSON v. ALORICA, INC.
as 1:2024cv00774
Defendant:
ALORICA, INC.
Plaintiff:
ELICCIA ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Shankar v. Microsoft Corporation
as 2:2024cv01506
Plaintiff:
Raghavendran Shankar
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Carthan v. Birch Tree Communities, Inc.
as 6:2024cv06126
Defendant:
Birch Tree Communities, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary Carthan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Balani v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 3:2024cv01509
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Plaintiff:
Sabeeta Balani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nassif v. East Orlando Imports, Inc. dba Classic Mazda East
as 6:2024cv01706
Defendant:
East Orlando Imports, Inc. dba Classic Mazda East
Plaintiff:
Sonia Lynn Nassif
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Swartz v. Advantage Medical Equipment, LLC d/b/a Transitions Medical Equipment et al
as 1:2024cv08665
Defendant:
Advantage Medical Equipment, LLC d/b/a Transitions Medical Equipment and Transitions Palliative and Primary Care, MSO, LLC
Plaintiff:
Mary Swartz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Coleman-Morales v. Nestle USA, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00516
Defendant:
Nestle USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sydnie Coleman-Morales
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Jenkins v. Charleston Water System
as 2:2024cv05165
Defendant:
Charleston Water System
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
