Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Frisone v. NANA WALL SYSTEMS, INC.
as 1:2024cv05025
Plaintiff:
Kevin Frisone
Defendant:
NANA WALL SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hess v. Township of Saint Thomas et al
as 1:2023cv00544
Plaintiff:
Dale A. Hess
Defendant:
Township of Saint Thomas, Saint Thomas Township Municipal Authority, Travis Amsley and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Walling v. Madison Health and Rehabilitation
as 1:2022cv00270
Plaintiff:
Tasha Walling
Defendant:
Madison Health and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
WALLS v. MILLER EDGE, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv03596
Plaintiff:
MR. MARK WALL
Defendant:
MILLER EDGE, INC., MR. JOHN CAGGIANO and MR. TIM CASTELLO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Walls v. NCAM VW, LLC
as 5:2022cv00429
Plaintiff:
Thomas Walls
Defendant:
NCAM VW, LLC doing business as Volkswagen of Streetsboro
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Walls v. Pulaski Electric System
as 1:2021cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jonathon C. Walls
Defendant:
Pulaski Electric System
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Dykes v. Florida Wall Concepts, Inc.
as 6:2020cv00077
Defendant:
FLORIDA WALL CONCEPTS INC. and Florida Wall Concepts, Inc.
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS DYKES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Singleton v. Bethesda Health Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00537
Defendant:
Bethesda Health Group, Inc. , Beverly Walls , Alexis Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Rico Singleton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Adams v. Yokogawa USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00005
Plaintiff:
Preston Adams
Defendant:
Yokogawa USA, Inc. and Kelly Wall
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Sumner v. Mary Washington Healthcare Physicians et al
as 3:2015cv00042
Plaintiff:
Dillard L. Sumner, Jr.
Defendant:
Mary Washington Healthcare Physicians, MediCorp Health Services, Inc. and Kathryn S. Wall
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
