Cases 1 - 10 of 553
Personette et al v. Musk et al
as 3:2024cv06266
Plaintiff:
Dalana Brand, James Sullivan and Sarah Personette
Defendant:
Elon Musk, X CORP., Twitter, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
James-Irvin et al v. Muslims of America et al
as 3:2024cv00608
Defendant:
Def Jam, BIA, Lamont Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
J.M.O.M., Keita M James-Irvin and W.W.M., Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Godfrey v. Eunice City Court
as 24-30518
Defendant:
Noah Glass, Biz Stone, City of Eunice and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Godfrey, Jr.
Greenspan v. Musk et al
as 3:2024cv04647
Defendant:
DOES 1-10,, Elon Musk, Singer Cashman, LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Greenspan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Bishop et al v. Twitter
as 1:2024cv02150
Defendant:
Twitter
Plaintiff:
#BloodandBananaspro, #Blackspaghettifilms, #MooninthedayTV and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Frazier v. X Corp.
as 24-1948
Petitioner:
YOSUB KIM, SHELLY YIP, NICHOLAS TAPALANSKY and others
Respondent:
X HOLDINGS CORP, formerly known as X Holdings I, Inc. and X CORP., formerly known as Twitter, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv04054
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Abadi v. Adams
as 24-1608
Plaintiff:
AARON ABADI
Defendant:
ERIC ADAMS, in his personal capacity, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, BILL DE BLASIO, in his personal capacity and others
Allen v. Facebook, et al
as 24-3080
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZUCKERBERG, TWITTER, FACEBOOK and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY ALLEN
Kaiden v. Musk et al
as 3:2024cv03554
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc. Change of Control and Involuntary Termination Protection Policy, X Corp, Twitter Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Kaiden
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
