Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Cases
NAULT v. IMPERIAL DADE (ROBERT TILLIS/CEO)
as 2:2020cv09149
Defendant: IMPERIAL DADE (ROBERT TILLIS/CEO)
Plaintiff: DANIEL A. NAULT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Diana Cherry v. Doyle Simon
as 17-56697
Plaintiff - Appellant: DIANA COLE CHERRY
Defendant - Appellee: DOYLE R. SIMONS, CEO of Weyerhaeuser
BLACK V. OAK RIDGE FINANCIAL SERVICES,INC., ET AL.
as 1:2017cv01006
Plaintiff: RONALD O. BLACK
Defendant: OAK RIDGE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. , BANK OF OAK RIDGE , BANK OF OAK RIDGE AMENDED CEO NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Aishman v. GCIU Retirement Fund CEO et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00268
Plaintiff: Alfred Aishman
Defendant: GCIU Retirement Fund CEO, GCIU Retirement Fund Employers, Mathew Wenner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Marva Richardson-Roy v. Abigail Johnson, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1914
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARVA JANE RICHARDSON-ROY
Defendant - Appellee: ABIGAIL JOHNSON, President, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, QDRO ADMIINISTRATION GROUP, a fiduciary agent for General Motors Corporation and others
HINKES v. MCADAM et al
as 2:2013cv01745
Plaintiff: ELIZABETH AND DAVID HINKES
Defendant: LOWELL C. MCADAM , VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. , URSULA BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Dickerson v. Mutual of America
as 10-1647
Plaintiff - Appellant: Gloria Deanna Dickerson
Defendant - Appellee: Mutual of America and Thomas J. Moran, President & CEO
Johnson v. Cardinal Health Inc et al
as 2:2004cv00722
Plaintiff: Margaret R Johnson
Defendant: Cardinal Health Inc, Robert D Walter, Richard J Miller and others
Petitioner: James DeCarlo, Charles Heitholt, Andrew W Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?