Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Powers v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2023cv04701
Plaintiff:
Michael Earnest Powers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00636
Plaintiff:
Earnest Jones, III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Norrman v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2022cv02599
Plaintiff:
Earnest Norrman
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pickens v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 6:2021cv00573
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Earnest Pickens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Earnest v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv00102
Plaintiff:
Carryne Jean Earnest
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Charles Lunz v. Nancy Berryhill
as 17-35184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES EARNEST LUNZ
Defendant - Appellee:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Commissioner of Social Security
Walker-Earnest v. Colvin
as 4:2016cv00642
Plaintiff:
Clara Frances Walker-Earnest
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lunz v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00004
Plaintiff:
Charles Earnest Lunz
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Earnest v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2015cv00394
Plaintiff:
Tina Earnest
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Earnest v. Colvin
as 4:2014cv00615
Plaintiff:
Carryne J. Earnest
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
