Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Sharie Cronk Sneddon v. Martin J. O'Malley
as 8:2023cv02487
Plaintiff:
Sharie Cronk Sneddon
Petitioner:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant:
Martin J. O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Morton v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00588
Plaintiff:
Shari Morton
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSAOGC and SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
McCready v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv05292
Plaintiff:
Shari Michelle McCready
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Nelson v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv03141
Plaintiff:
Shari Lynne Nelson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Yamashiro v. Social Security
as 2:2022cv01656
Plaintiff:
Shari Eiko Yamashiro
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Albright v. Social Security
as 1:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
Shari Albright
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Conway v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00667
Plaintiff:
Lekeia Shari Conway
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lafountain v. Kijakazi
as 22-466
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shari Lafountain
Defendant / Appellee:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Commissioner of Social Security
Greenberg Melamed v. Saul
as 1:2021cv02900
Plaintiff:
Shari Greenberg Melamed
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lafountain v. Saul
as 8:2020cv01266
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Shari Lafountain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
