Cases 21 - 30 of 653
Terry v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00505
Plaintiff:
Randall Wayne Terry
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Herring v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00692
Plaintiff:
Terri Eugenia Herring
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
Terri Lynn Taylor
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
(SS) Morrison v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv01559
Plaintiff:
Terry Allen Morrison
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Terry v. Kijakazi
as 5:2022cv07562
Plaintiff:
Anthony Terry
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Leslie v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv03174
Plaintiff:
Terry A Leslie
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Matlock v. SSA
as 6:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
Terry D. Matlock
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Andrews v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv02219
Plaintiff:
Terrie L Andrews
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
PENDER v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv01899
Plaintiff:
TERRI L. PENDER
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0423 Social Security Act (Disability Insurance Benefit Payments)
Sprehe v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2022cv00844
Plaintiff:
Terri Sprehe
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
