Cases 71 - 80 of 327
Whittington v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2019cv05487
Defendant:
Steve Dyson, Brad Marler and Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
Scott A Whittington
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Churba v. Esquenazi
as 0:2019cv60793
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and Denise Esquenazi
Plaintiff:
Aaron Churba
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Churba v. Denise Esquenazi
as 0:2019cv60794
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and Denise Esquenazi
Plaintiff:
Aaron Churba
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
United States of America vs. Gloria Al-Sayegh
as 1:2019cv00306
Plaintiff:
Internal Revenue Service and United States of America
Defendant:
GLORIA AL-SAYEGH
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 1903
Internal Revenue Service v. Rahman et al
as 1:2019cv00145
Plaintiff:
Internal Revenue Service
Defendant:
Shakil S Rahman and Nahree Rahman
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
SHAIKH v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 3:2018cv17695
Plaintiff:
KIA H. SHAIKH and ZIA H. SHAIKH
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Overby v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2018xc09721
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Hancock Whitney Bank
Petitioner:
Rhonda Overby
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service and Minh Tran
Chavez v. West Texas Outreach et al
as 2:2018cv00062
Plaintiff:
Emilio Chavez, Jr
Defendant:
West Texas Outreach, Internal Revenue Service, Hugo R. Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Floyd v. United States of America, Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2018mc00032
Respondent:
Robert De Los Santos and United States of America, Internal Revenue Service
Petitioner:
Anthony James Floyd
Loomis v. United States of America et al
as 2:2018cv00399
Defendant:
JENNIFER GRAHAM, United States of America Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service, John and Jane Does 1-99 and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES WONG and Carrie Loomis
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6212
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
