Cases 1 - 10 of 195
TUCKER v. HARRIS et al
as 4:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
READERLYNN CARTER TUCKER
Defendant:
MARK HARRIS, ALETHEA HARRIS, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Farm Credit Mid-America, ACA et al
as 3:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Andrew Wilson
Defendant:
Farm Credit Mid-America, ACA, Farm Credit Mid-America, FLCA, Farm Credit Mid-America, PCA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Duckworth v. Yellow Social Interactive, Ltd
as 4:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
SANDRA TUCKER DUCKWORTH
Defendant:
YELLOW SOCIAL INTERACTIVE, LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
In re: Brian Calvert, et al v. BPS Direct LLC, et al
as 23-3235
Defendant / Appellee:
In re: BPS DIRECT LLC and CABELAS LLC
Plaintiff:
DAVID IRVIN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, BRIAN CALVERT, HEATHER CORNELL and others
IN RE: BPS DIRECT, LLC, AND CABELAS, LLC, WIRETAPPING LITIGATION
as 2:2023md03074
In Re:
IN RE: BPS DIRECT, LLC, AND CABELAS, LLC, WIRETAPPING LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
Timothy Durham, Arlie Tucker, GREG MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Tucker v. BPS DIRECT, LLC
as 2:2023cv02295
Plaintiff:
Arlie Tucker
Defendant:
BPS DIRECT, LLC, CABELA'S L.L.C. and Cabela's Retail MO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Durgan v. U-Haul International Incorporated
as 2:2022cv01565
Plaintiff:
Felicia Durgan, Evan Hatchell, Kasio Young and others
Defendant:
U-Haul International Incorporated
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Chris Bagley, Joseph Laventure, Jr., Daniel Tooker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
BURRESS-EL v. TUCKER et al
as 1:2023cv02966
Plaintiff:
ANTUAN BURRESS-EL
Defendant:
ASHTON TUCKER, SEAN DONOVAN and THEODORE BERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
