Environmental Matters Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 512
Strahan v. MEOEEA, et al
as 22-1225
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD MAX STRAHAN and RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN
Defendant / Appellee: MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS, Secretary, DAVID PIERCE, as director, Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries (MDMF), DANIEL J. MCKIERNAN, as director, Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries (MDMF) and others
Defendant: ARTHUR SAWYER, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as President of the Massachusetts Lobstermen's Association (MLA), CENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES, JOHN HAVILAND and others
Interested Party: MICHAEL J. MOORE, M.D., PETER CORKERON and UNITED STATES
David A Nufer LLC et al v. Michiana Cleaners Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00262
Plaintiff: David A Nufer LLC, JNK Inc and David's Discounted Drycleaning LLC doing business as Burton's Dry Cleaning
Defendant: Michiana Cleaners Inc., S&H Partnership, Donald H. Schefmeyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601 Comprehensive Env Response, Compensation & Liability Act
City of Fernley, et al v. Ernest Conant, et al
as 22-15400
Plaintiff / Appellant: CITY OF FERNLEY
Intervenor Plaintiff: DAVID F. STIX, Jr. and DEENA E. EDMONSTON
Defendant / Appellee: ERNEST A. CONANT, Regional Director of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, COMMISSIONER UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: PYRAMID LAKE PAIUTE TRIBE
Komor v. United States of America et al
as 4:2022cv00077
Plaintiff: Christian Robert Komor
Defendant: United States of America, Joseph R Biden, Steffanie Feldman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. Deb Haaland, et al
as 22-15091
Plaintiff / Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, ENDANGERED WOLF CENTER and others
Plaintiff: WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a non-profit organization and WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, a non-profit organization
Defendant / Appellee: DEB HAALAND, as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, a federal department, AMY LUEDERS, in her official capacity as Southwest Regional Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF GAME AND FISH
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. Deb Haaland, et al
as 22-15056
Plaintiff / Appellee: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, ENDANGERED WOLF CENTER and others
Defendant / Appellant: DEB HAALAND, as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, a federal department, AMY LUEDERS, in her official capacity as Southwest Regional Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF GAME AND FISH
Cafferata Family Trust, by and through its trustee, Frank Cafferata v. Sterling Screw Products, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv09418
Plaintiff: Cafferata Family Trust, by and through its trustee, Frank Cafferata
Defendant: Sterling Screw Products, Inc. and David Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Bush v. Sonoma West Holdings Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv08853
Plaintiff: William David Bush
Defendant: Sonoma West Holdings Inc and Michael Babbini
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Clark et al v. Haaland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01091
Plaintiff: Guy Clark, Linda Corwin, Craig Corwin and others
Defendant: Deb Haaland, Camille C Touton, Martha Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics v. U.S. Forest Service et al
as 6:2021cv01228
Plaintiff: Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics
Defendant: U.S. Forest Service and David Warnack
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 706

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?