Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Centreville Citizens for Change et al v. City of Cahokia Heights et al
as 3:2021cv00842
Plaintiff:
Centreville Citizens for Change, Walter Byrd, Lester Goree and others
Defendant:
City of Cahokia Heights, Commonfields of Cahokia and Commonfields of Cahokia Public Water District
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
UNITED STATES v. BYRD
as 1:2019cv18601
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
THOMAS J BYRD and THOMAS J. BYRD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Elder Creek Transfer & Recovery, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01310
Plaintiff:
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
Defendant:
Tony Cincotta, Elder Creek Transfer & Recovery, Inc. and Ryan Byrd
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Anderson Outdoor Advertising, Inc. et al v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv05370
Plaintiff:
Anderson Outdoor Advertising, Inc. , Brian Barfield , Ces Destin, LLC and others
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc. , BP America Production Company , BP p.l.c. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701 - Oil Pollution Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOHN T. BYRD
as 4:2012cv00053
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
John Thomas Byrd
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Auchard et al v. Tennessee Valley Authority (TV1)
as 3:2009cv00054
Plaintiff:
Linda Elaine Barnes, Robert Gajewski, Frank Balzer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hall et al v. Department of Defense et al
as 4:2008cv00278
Plaintiff:
Ralph Hall, Ann Hall, Joe Caple and others
Defendant:
Department of Defense, Michael C Wehr, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Byrd, Daniel v. EPA
as 98-5180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Byrd, doing business as Consultants in Toxicology, Risk Assessment and Product Safety
Defendant - Appellee:
Environmental Protection Agency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
