Environmental Matters Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v. Conagra Foods, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv06347
Defendant: Osco Industries, Inc., Lancaster Commercial Products, LLC, Masco Cabinetry LLC and others
Plaintiff: The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 280 Salem Street, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv11321
Defendant: ConAgra Grocery Products Company, LLC, NSTAR Electric Company d/b/a Eversource Energy, BASF Corporation and others
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Cooper Drum Cooperating Parties Group v. Angeles Chemical Co Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv03007
Defendant: Angeles Chemical Co., Inc., Pacific Die Casting Corporation, Angelus Waterproofing and Restoration, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant: Cooper Drum Cooperating Parties Group
3Rd Party Defendant: Mondo Chrome, JET CUSTOM CHROME, All State Welding Alloy and others
Cross Defendant: Far Best Corporation, American Polymers Corporation, M.O. Dion and Sons, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: TW Tedesco Properties, L.P.
Counter Claimant: Viad Corporation and Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
Petitioner: SASOL CHEMICALS (USA) LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
United States of America et al v. AAI Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv02909
Plaintiff: United States of America and State of Maryland
Defendant: AAI Corporation, City of Baltimore, Maryland, CSX Realty Development, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613
United States of America v. Conagra Foods, Inc., et al
as 2:2013cv02756
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Conagra Foods, Inc. and Conagra Grocery Products, LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Hobart Corporation et al v. The Dayton Power and Light Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00115
Cross Claimant: Pharmacia LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and Dayton Power and Light Company
Counter Claimant: Standard Register Company, Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations LLC, Valley Asphalt Corporation and others
Defendant: Dayton Industrial Drum, Inc., PPG Industries, Inc., Waste Management of Ohio, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant: United States Department of Defense, Sherwin-Williams Company, "John Doe" Corporation(s) and others
Counter Defendant: Harris Corporation, Franklin Iron & Metal Corp, City of Dayton, Ohio and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Ronald H. Barnett, Dryden Road Investments, LLC, South Dayton Land Fill Remediation Trust and others
Plaintiff: Hobart Corporation and Kelsey-Hayes Company doing business as ZF Active Safety US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
USA v. CONAGRA GROCERY PRODUCTS COMPANY LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00455
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: CONAGRA GROCERY PRODUCTS COMPANY LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
United States of America v. Waste Management of Wisconsin Inc et al
as 2:2011cv00346
Defendant: Arcelormittal Mortgage Acceptance Inc, Master Lock Company LLC, CNH America LLC and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
United States of America v. Wilhelm Enterprises Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00840
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Wilhelm Enterprises Corporation, New York State Electric & Gas Corporation, Jimcar Development, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Type: Other Statutes None
R & D Environmental Services, Inc. v. Mystik Transportation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2008cv00181
Plaintiff: R & D Environmental Services, Inc.
Defendant: Mystik Transportation, Lois Baldon, Sidney B. Baldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?