Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Parkman v. State of California et al
as 8:2023cv02952
Plaintiff:
Raymond Grant Parkman
Defendant:
State of California Franchise Tax Board doing business as Agent John Does 1-100 and Deputy Assistant Attorney General doing business as David A. Hubbert
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
State of Texas v. DHS
as 23-50869
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of Texas
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States Customs and Border Protection and others
Amicus Curiae:
Immigration Reform Law Institute and Center for Renewing America, Incorporated
Gary Maddox, Jr. v. The Parole Commission of Maryland and its Agents
as 23-6632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY EUGENE MADDOX, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
THE PAROLE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND AND ITS AGENTS, DAVID R. BLUMBERG, Chairman, DEANGELO PATTERSON, Agent and others
Spears v. U S Dept of Justice et al
as 2:2022cv06103
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dwayne Spears
Respondent:
Department of Justice and DEA Agent Anthony Pharao
Defendant:
U S Drug Enforcement Administration, USA, U S Dept of Justice and others
Petitioner:
MJK Trucking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Texas Medical Association et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2022cv00372
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, LLC and Dr. Adam Corley
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Lifenet, Inc. and East Texas Air One
Consolidated Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. Department of Labor and others
Amicus Curiae:
Physicians Advocacy Institute, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Congress of Neurological Surgeons and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Maddox, Jr. v. The Parole Commission of Maryland and its Agents et al
as 1:2022cv01769
Plaintiff:
Gary Eugene Maddox, Jr.
Defendant:
The Parole Commission of Maryland and its Agents, David R. Blumberg, DeAngelo Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Texas Medical Association et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2021cv00425
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association and Dr. Adam Corley
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Labor, United States Department of Treasury and others
Amicus Curiae:
Physicians Advocacy Institute, California Medical Association, Connecticut State Medical Society and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
U.S. CITIZEN et al v. U.S. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT et al
as 1:2019cv01012
Plaintiff:
U.S. COMPANY and U.S. CITIZEN
Defendant:
U.S. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, MICHAEL MCCORD, UNKNOWN AGENTS OF THE U.S. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Claudia Sarahi Rueda Vidal v. Homeland Security et al
as 2:2018cv09276
Defendant:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Director of USCIS CA Kathy A. Baran, Daniel Brightman and others
Plaintiff:
Claudia Sarahi Rueda Vidal
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Volloldo v. Ruz
as 18-1562
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alfredo Volloldo, individually and Gustavo F. Villoldo, individually, and as Administrator, Executor, and Personal Representative of the Estate of Gustavo Villoldo Arghagos
Respondent - Appellee:
Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli
Defendant:
Fidel Castro Ruz, as an individual, and as an official, or agent of The Republic of Cuba, Raul Castro Ruz, as an individual, and as an official, employee, or agent of The Republic of Cuba, The Ministry of Interior, an agency or instrumentality of The Republic of Cuba and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
