Cases 51 - 60 of 235
Little Rock Family Planning Services et al v. Jegley et al
as 4:2021cv00453
Defendant:
Marsha Boss, William L Rutledge, Melissa Faulkenberry and others
Plaintiff:
Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma on behalf of itself and its patients doing business as Planned Parenthood Great Plains, Little Rock Family Planning Services and Janet Cathey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Maxfield et al v. Cox et al
as 4:2021cv00051
Defendant:
Spencer Cox and Deidre Henderson
Plaintiff:
Steven G. Maxfield, Lori Newby and Daniel Newby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Illinois Institute of Technology
as 1:2021cv02512
Defendant:
Illinois Institute of Technology
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Daniel Fee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vaughn v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2021cv00504
Plaintiff:
William Vaughn and Mosias
Defendant:
Tim Fitch, Saint Louis County Assessor, State of Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denham et al v. Hall-Long et al
as 1:2021cv00511
Defendant:
Brian Townsend, Brian Pettyjohn, David P. Sokola and others
Plaintiff:
Donna Austin, Kimberley Lake, Jennifer Rambo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Online Merchants Guild v. Hassell
as 1:2021cv00369
Defendant:
C. Daniel Hassell
Plaintiff:
Online Merchants Guild
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Veit v. Harrison Community Schools Board of Education et al
as 1:2020cv01146
Defendant:
Harrison School District et. al., Richard Foote, Therese Haley and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Veit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Renna et al v Becerra et al
as 3:2020cv02190
Plaintiff:
Laura Schwartz, Danielle Jaymes, Darin Prince and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Luis Lopez and Robert Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Young v. Cameron
as 3:2020cv00680
Defendant:
Daniel Cameron
Plaintiff:
Huguette Nicole Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
