Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Robert D. Thompson v. US
as 16-1786
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT D. THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Grattafiori v. Thompson et al
as 4:2016cv00004
Plaintiff:
Albert N. Grattafiori
Defendant:
Letravius D. Thompson and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. United States
as 1:2015cv02181
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Thompson
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Lincoln Benefit Life Company v. Thompson et al
as 5:2015cv00198
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Benefit Life Company
Defendant:
John D Thompson, Deja' Johnson and Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Rosenbaum et al
as 3:2015cv00020
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Jones
Defendant:
Joseph L. Rosenbaum , Jason D. Thompson, Rosenbaum & Rosenbaum P.S.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilhite et al v. Acell Investors Limited
as 3:2013cv01421
Plaintiff:
Michael T Wilhite, Jr , Michael D Thompson , The Williamsburg Corp and others
Defendant:
Acell Investors Limited
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Clarence M Farmer Jr v. Don M Bailey et al
as 8:2012cv02019
Defendant:
Don M Bailey, Mitchell J Blutt, Neal C Bradsher and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence C Farmer Jr
Interested Party:
Questcor Pharmaceuticals Inc
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY v. POPLAR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LLC et al
as 5:2012cv00457
Plaintiff:
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY
Defendant:
POPLAR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LLC, RAHIL KAZI, DAVID D THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Earl Richards v. Don M Bailey et al
as 8:2012cv01754
Defendant:
Don M Bailey, Mitchell J Blutt, Stephen L Cartt and others
Movant:
Gerald Easton and Bruce Johnson
Plaintiff:
Earl Richards
James Tripoli v. Don M Bailey et al
as 8:2012cv01759
Defendant:
Don M Bailey, Mitchell J Blutt, Neal C Bradsher and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Johnson, - and James Tripoli
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
