Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Pitonyak Machinery Corporation v. Brandt Industries Ltd et al
as 4:2010cv00772
Plaintiff:
Pitonyak Machinery Corporation
Defendant:
Brandt Industries Ltd and Brandt Agricultural Products Ltd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
BRANDT INDUSTRIES LTD. v. PITONYAK MACHINERY CORPORATION
as 1:2010cv00857
Plaintiff:
BRANDT INDUSTRIES LTD.
Defendant:
PITONYAK MACHINERY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Brandt v. Zara USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv04785
Plaintiff:
Nick Brandt
Defendant:
Zara USA, Inc., Industria de Diseno Textil, S.A. and Zara International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Brandt v. Smith et al
as 1:2009cv08336
Plaintiff:
Richard Brandt
Defendant:
Lloyd V. Smith and National Collegiate Athletic Association
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Marketing Technology Solutions, Inc. v. Medizine LLC et al
as 1:2009cv08122
Plaintiff:
Marketing Technology Solutions, Inc. and Marketing Technology Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Medizine LLC, Daniel Brandt, Michael Rowsom and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc. et al v. Various John and Jane Does et al
as 3:2008cv00044
Plaintiff:
National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc., Motorsports Authentics LLC, Speedway Motorsports, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Various John and Jane Does, Various XYZ Corporations, Frank Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Douglas R Hume v. Daniel Brandt et al
as 2:2007cv06108
Plaintiff:
Douglas R Hume
Defendant:
Daniel Brandt and Myspace Marketing Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Cloyd v. American Aluminum Boats Inc et al
as 2:2007cv00212
Plaintiff:
Darin Deke K Cloyd
Defendant:
American Aluminum Boats Inc, Southpaw Marine & Machine LLC, Travis B Brandt and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
