Cases 31 - 40 of 305
SHOOK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2022cv01171
Plaintiff:
TANYA JEANETTE SHOOK
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cruz v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00762
Plaintiff:
Tanya T Cruz
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Thompson v. Kilolo
as 3:2022cv00460
Plaintiff:
Tanya Thompson
Defendant:
Kijakazi Kilolo
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jones v. Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv01811
Plaintiff:
Tanya Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Casey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00653
Plaintiff:
Tanya Helen Casey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Morgan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv01046
Plaintiff:
Tanya S Morgan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tanya Makela v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 22-1047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TANYA RAE MAKELA
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, named as Andrew Saul
Uribe v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2021cv00160
Plaintiff:
Tanya M Uribe and Tanya M. Uribe
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Svendsen v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv01029
Plaintiff:
Tanya Svendsen
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Engelby v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv01236
Plaintiff:
Tanya S Engelby
Interested Party:
Commissioner of Social Security and SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
