Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Baxley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Lisa Joy Baxley
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Kansas City Region Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (DIWC)
Baxley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00654
Plaintiff:
Ricanna Marie Baxley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
BAXLEY v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv00403
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
NASHA BAXLEY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Baxley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv00036
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Billy Baxley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BAXLEY v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv01048
Plaintiff:
JOE TORRIS BAXLEY
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
BAXLEY v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv01372
Plaintiff:
DEANNA KAY BAXLEY
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Baxley v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2013cv00129
Plaintiff:
Regina M Baxley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BAXLEY v. ASTRUE
as 5:2012cv00069
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BAXLEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL J ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Hill v. Astrue
as 2:2010cv02595
Appellant:
Julie Baxley Hill
Appellee:
Michael Astrue
Miscellaneou:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
BAXLEY v. ASTRUE
as 1:2010cv00830
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. BAXLEY
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
