Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Simms v. Bisignano
as 1:2026cv00040
Plaintiff:
Sharee Simms
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Simms v. Bisignano
as 2:2026cv00040
Plaintiff:
Sharee Simms
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Harrell v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2025cv00242
Plaintiff:
Sharee Harrell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ballard v. Dudek
as 5:2025cv00045
Plaintiff:
Sharee Dawn Ballard
Defendant:
Leland Dudek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g RSI Tax Suits
Hills v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Sharee R. Hills
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
D. v. Kijakazi et al
as 2:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Sharee D.
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, SSA Notice and Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Knott v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv02149
Plaintiff:
Michelle Sharee Knott
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Walker v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv01645
Plaintiff:
Erica Sharee Walker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MARTIN v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv03214
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
SHAREE R. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Meredith v. Saul
as 8:2020cv02985
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Plaintiff:
Sharee Meredith
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
