Cases 21 - 30 of 43
PNC Bank, National Association v. Kim et al
as 1:2013cv00887
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Beom Soo Kim, Young Ock Hyun, Fairfax Ridge Homeowners Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Petition to Quiet Title
United States Of America v. Young
as 3:2013cv00015
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Cheryl M. Young
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Young v. USA
as 2:2012cv00400
Plaintiff:
Leah Young
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
United States of America v. Young
as 4:2012cv00169
Respondent:
Robert L Young
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
United States of America v. Young
as 1:2012cv00808
Respondent:
Charles James Young, Jr.
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2012cv00019
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KENNETH N YOUNG and KEN YOUNG COMPANY INC
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
The Estate of Nancy P. Young v. United States of America
as 1:2011cv11829
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Nancy P. Young
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
United States of America v. Young et al
as 3:2010cv08193
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Shelia Young, Deane Young, Kennith Defoor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1340
Bateman et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2010cv00765
Plaintiff:
Rodger Bateman, Shannon Byrd, Rita Byrd and others
Defendant:
United States of America , U.S. Department of The Treasury, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The Global Information, Inc., et al v. USA
as 10-56228
Petitioner - Appellant:
THE GLOBAL INFORMATION, INC., DONAMDONG CHURCH, II GWANG GONG YOUNG and others
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
