Cases 1 - 10 of 16
United States of America v. Smith et al
as 3:2020cv00535
Defendant:
Temple Theater For the Performing Arts and Roger L. Smith
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Smith v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv00271
Plaintiff:
Mathew L. Smith
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Santander Bank, N.A. v. Smith et al
as 1:2017cv10802
Defendant:
United States of America , Cynthia L. Smith, Massachusetts Department of Revenue and others
Plaintiff:
Santander Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Barber v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2017cv00284
Plaintiff:
Donald Joe Barber
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, John Koskinen, Rebecca Kline and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
United States of America v. Smith et al
as 2:2016cv00646
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ronald E Smith, Deborah L Smith, Joyce A Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Hook v. United State
as 15-1022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY JULIA HOOK
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Smith et al
as 3:2014cv05952
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Terry L. Smith, Louise A. Smith, Blue Bear Company and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
Oakes et al v. USA
as 1:2014cv02968
Plaintiff:
Ronald Oakes , Freya L Broyles , Rodney Schroeder and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Smith et al v. USA
as 1:2013cv01156
Plaintiff:
M. Julia Hook and David L. Smith
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Action affecting property on which US has lien
Monkemeier v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2012cv02574
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service , James Ashton, James Daughtery and others
Plaintiff:
James L. Monkemeier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
