Cases 91 - 100 of 891
Eric Malone v. Toyota Motor Sales
as 2:2022cv00929
Plaintiff:
Eric Malone
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
Jose Javier Perez v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00780
Plaintiff:
Jose Javier Perez
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., Toyota Motor Corporation and Southeast Toyota Distributors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Eric Malone v. Toyota Motor Sales
as 5:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Eric Malone
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rickey et al v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp
as 4:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Matthew R. Rickey and Augustus M. Rickey
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Credit Corp doing business as Toyota Financial Services
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
NCAMK, LLC v. Motorcars Acquisition IV, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
NCAMK, LLC doing business as Kia of Streetsboro
Defendant:
Destiny Tillison and Motorcars Acquisition IV, LLC doing business as Toyota of Bedford
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
