Cases 101 - 110 of 216
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv03292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BARCLIFT v. MANN BRACKEN, LLP et al
as 3:2009cv00475
Plaintiff:
SHERRI BARCLIFT
Defendant:
MANN BRACKEN, LLP and ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Harmon v. Mann Bracken, LLP et al
as 6:2009cv06296
Plaintiff:
Eleanor Jean Harmon
Defendant:
Mann Bracken, LLP and Arrow Financial Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ROSE v. BRACHFELD et al
as 1:2009cv00805
Plaintiff:
LEIGH ROSE
Defendant:
ERICA L. BRACHFELD, SESSOMS & ROGERS, P.A. and ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Danny Levy v. Arrow Financial Services LLC
as 2:2009cv06856
Plaintiff:
Danny Levy
Defendant:
Arrow Financial Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WILSON v. ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv01056
Plaintiff:
DARRIN WILSON, DARRIN WILSON and DARRIN WILSON
Defendant:
ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC and BOWMAN, HEINTZ, BOSCIA & VICIAN, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tilton v. Tate & Kirlin Associates et al
as 3:2009cv03212
Plaintiff:
Albert . Tilton and Albert . Tilton
Defendant:
Tate & Kirlin Associates and Arrow Financial Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
