Cases 11 - 20 of 30
USA v. David Long
as 19-3070
Defendant / Appellant:
David M. Long, also known as Damo
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00363
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
New Holy et al v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 5:2019cv05066
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, John M. Long, Danielle Daughtery and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn New Holy, Sandra Fire Lightning and Stephanie Star Comes Out
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SKYLINE MANOR, INC. v. BUCKLES et al
as 1:2017mc00057
Defendant:
SCOTT A. BUCKLES, CLARKE REALTY, DAN ELLIOTT, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SKYLINE MANOR, INC.
Ross et al v. Buckles et al
as 8:2017mc00089
Defendant:
Scott A. Buckles, Clarke Realty, LLC, Dan Elliott, Inc. and others
Creditor:
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors
Plaintiff:
Ron Ross
Debtor:
Skyline Manor, Inc.
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Ross et al v. Buckles et al
as 8:2017mc00062
Defendant:
Scott A. Buckles, Clarke Realty, LLC, Dan Elliott, Inc. and others
Creditor:
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors
Plaintiff:
Ron Ross
Debtor:
Skyline Manor, Inc.
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Ross v. Skyline Manor, Inc. et al
as 8:2017mc00038
Defendant:
Scott A. Buckles, Clarke Realty, LLC, Dan Elliott, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ron Ross
Debtor:
Skyline Manor, Inc.
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Ross et al v. Skyline Manor, Inc. et al
as 8:2015mc00126
Defendant:
Scott A. Buckles, Clarke Realty, Dan Elliott and others
Creditor:
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors
Plaintiff:
Ron Ross
Debtor:
Skyline Manor, Inc.
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
