Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Arce v. Chautauqua Family Court
as 19-3412
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Armando Arce
Defendant / Appellee:
8th Judicial District, official capacity, Michael F. Griffith, individual and official capacity, Michael K. Bobseine, official capacity and others
Clayland Farm Enterprises, LLC v. Talbot County, Maryland
as 19-2102
Defendant / Appellee:
JACK FISCHER, in his individual and official capacity, THOMAS HUGHES, in his individual and official capacity, TALBOT COUNTY, MARYLAND and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLAYLAND FARM ENTERPRISES, LLC
Defendant:
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
Carchex, LLC v. Ian Chado
as 19-228
Respondent:
MARCELLUS BROTHERS, KAREN BOWERS, IRA LEWIS and others
Petitioner:
CARCHEX, LLC
Massachusetts Fiscal Alliance v Sullivan, et al.
as 1:2018cv12119
Plaintiff:
Massachusetts Fiscal Alliance
Defendant:
Michael Sullivan, Maura Healey and John P. Pappas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jefferies LLC v. WTW Investment Company LTD et al
as 3:2017cv00332
Plaintiff:
WTW Investment Company LTD, Jefferies LLC, Mark E Trivette and others
Not Yet Classified:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Michael Sullivan v. Endeavor Air, Inc.
as 16-1653
Petitioner - Appellant:
Michael Sullivan
Defendant - Appellee:
Endeavor Air, Inc., formerly known as Pinnacle Airlines, Inc., formerly known as Express Airlines, Inc., formerly known as NWA Airlink
Sullivan v. Endeavor Air, Inc.
as 0:2015cv03534
Petitioner:
Michael Sullivan
Respondent:
Endeavor Air, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv00377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Drake v Kastl, et al
as 4:2011mc00037
Petitioner:
Eric Drake
Respondent:
Kristina Nadine Kastl, Sean Michael Sullivan, Maria Sotelo and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
