Cases 11 - 20 of 1,408
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Tucker v. Manpowergroup
as 1:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Tyson Tucker
Defendant:
Manpowergroup
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tucker, et al v. Werfel
as 24-1147
Petitioner:
CASSANDRA TUCKER and EDWARD F. BRODIE
Respondent:
DANIEL I. WERFEL, Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service
Wilson v. Farm Credit Mid-America, ACA et al
as 3:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Andrew Wilson
Defendant:
Farm Credit Mid-America, ACA, Farm Credit Mid-America, FLCA, Farm Credit Mid-America, PCA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cahill, et al. v. NIKE, Inc.
as 24-165
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KELLY CAHILL, SARA JOHNSTON, LINDSAY ELIZABETH and others
Plaintiff:
TRACEE CHENG, SAMANTHA PHILLIPS, CINDY LEA LINEBAUGH and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NIKE, INC., an Oregon Corporation
In re: Brian Calvert, et al v. BPS Direct LLC, et al
as 23-3235
Defendant / Appellee:
In re: BPS DIRECT LLC and CABELAS LLC
Plaintiff:
DAVID IRVIN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, BRIAN CALVERT, HEATHER CORNELL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Duckworth v. Yellow Social Interactive, Ltd
as 4:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
SANDRA TUCKER DUCKWORTH
Defendant:
YELLOW SOCIAL INTERACTIVE, LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
