Cases 21 - 30 of 984
HINNANT v. OLD VINEYARD BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
CARLA HINNANT
Defendant:
OLD VINEYARD BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Enriquez-Maldonado v. Garland
as 24-97
Petitioner:
CARLA FILOMENA ENRIQUEZ-MALDONADO and BRITHANY ARIANNA CONDO-ENRIQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Carla Aramouni v. ACELYRIN, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv09672
Plaintiff:
Carla Aramouni
Defendant:
ACELYRIN, Inc., Shao-Lee Lin, Mardi C. Dier and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Pena-Torres, et al v. University of Science, Arts and Tech, et al
as 23-1923
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUJEIL PENA-TORRES, JOSE E. BLASCO-JUSINO, LUCERO RODRIGUEZ-FERNANDEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE, Arts and Tech, a/k/a USAT, a/k/a Medical College of London, a/k/a Malina Medical College, a/k/a Metropolitan Innovative Group, Inc., a/k/a USAT Montserrat LLC, ORIEN L. TULP, CARLA M. KONYK and others
Bouvier v. Office of Appellate Operations et al
as 3:2023cv30116
Plaintiff:
Carla Bouvier
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Office of Appellant Operation and Office of Appellate Operations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2136
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
