Cases 21 - 30 of 147
Monticello Village Court, Inc, et al v. Bey
as 1:2023cv10855
Plaintiff:
Monticello Village Court, Inc., Policeman Matthew Rohner and The People of the State of New York (Unidentified Party)
Defendant:
Akwa Azeem Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Securities and Exchange Commission et al v. GPB Capital Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00583
Defendant:
David Gentile, Jeffry Schneider, GPB Capital Holdings, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Interested Party:
Bohnenkamp Living Trust, Joseph T. Gardemal III and People Of The State Of New York
Intervenor:
United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York
Amicus Curiae:
FSC Securities Corp.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al v. Safeguard Metals LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00691
Defendant:
Jeffrey Santulan, Safeguard Metals LLC and Jeffrey Hill
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Alabama Securities Commission, Arizona Corporation Commission and others
Petitioner:
Utah Division of Securities
Arizona, State of et al v. Michael D Lansky LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Arizona, State of, Alabama, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Defendant:
Michael D Lansky LLC an Arizona limited liability company doing business as Avid Telecom, Michael D Lansky individually as a Member/Manager/Chief Executive Officer of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom and Stacy S Reeves individually as a Manager/Vice President of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Nexus Services, Inc.
as 23-1836
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NEXUS SERVICES, INC., LIBRE BY NEXUS, INC., MICHEAL DONOVAN and others
Commodity Futures v. TMTE, Inc.
as 23-10420
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Alabama Securities Commission, State of Alaska and others
Appellee:
Kelly Crawford
Appellant:
Daniel Bruce Spitzer
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Roomster Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv07389
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission, People of The State of California, State of Colorado and others
Defendant:
Roomster Corp., John Shriber, Roman Zaks and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 45 Federal Trade Commission Act (unfair or deceptive acts)
Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al v. TMTE Inc et al
as 3:2020cv02910
Defendant:
TMTE Inc, Lucas Thomas Erb, Lucas Asher and others
Plaintiff:
Office of the Attorney General and State of Florida Office of Financial Regulation, State of Texas, State of Florida and others
Receiver:
Kelly Crawford
Respondent:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP and Bank of America NA
Petitioner:
Google, Portfolio Insider LLC and Carlos Cruz
Claimant:
Stephen Austin
Not Classified By Court:
Daniel Bruce Spitzer
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 1:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, People of the State of New York, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York and People of The State of New York
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al v. RD Legal Funding LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00890
Defendant:
RD Legal Funding LLC, RD Legal Funding Partners, LP and RD Legal Finance, LLC
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and People of the State of New York
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Roni Dersovitz
Not Classified By Court:
Christopher LoPalo
Interested Party:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Amicus Curiae:
Proposed Amicus Curie Plaintiff Settlement Class and American Legal Finance Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
