Cases 21 - 30 of 8,298
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Copeland v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. et al
as 1:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Dina Copeland
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., Equifax Information Services, LLC and Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ortega v. Secure One Capital Corporation
as 5:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Mark Ortega
Defendant:
Secure One Capital Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
KISENDA v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02081
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER KISENDA
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Pena v. Credit One Bank, N.A.
as 5:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Kourtney Pena
Defendant:
Credit One Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Breedlove-Crabtree v. Capital One, N.A.
as 3:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Pepper Breedlove-Crabtree
Defendant:
Capital One, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
