Cases 31 - 40 of 540
Prosser v. USHealth Advisors, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Christopher Prosser
Defendant:
USHealth Advisors, LLC, US Health Advisors, LLC, Patrick Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Montpelier v. Doe
as 3:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Dale J Montpelier and Dale J Montpelier, Sr.
Defendant:
John & Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Perez v. Does 1-10 et al
as 1:2022cv09662
Plaintiff:
JEREMY PEREZ
Defendant:
NYPD John/Jane Doe Officers 1-10, CITY OF NEW YORK and Police Officer John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
R. Tubaman v. John Lambert et al
as 2:2022cv07661
Plaintiff:
R. Tubaman
Defendant:
John Lambert, Sup. Michelle Unknown Last Name, Animal Control and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Grimsley et al v. Nike Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01574
Defendant:
Inmate Calling Solutions, Valley Family Health Care, Citizens United for the Rehabilitation of Errants and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Alexander Grimsley, Leonardo Rafael Urquijo Arvizu, Steven Tyler Premo and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
O'Connor v. Snyder et al
as 1:2022cv01607
Plaintiff:
Janis O'Connor
Defendant:
Elmer A. Snyder, Lori Snyder, A&L Enterprises, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
TOBIN v. MARGIOTTA et al
as 3:2022cv05613
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW TOBIN
Defendant:
MICHAEL MARGIOTTA, PATIENT IDENTIFICATION PLATFORM, INC. and JOHN/JANE DOES (1-5)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bainbridge Taxpayers Unite et al v. City of Bainbridge Island et al
as 3:2022cv05491
Plaintiff:
Bainbridge Taxpayers Unite, Lee Rosenbaum, Janice Pyke and others
Defendant:
The City of Bainbridge Island, Kolby Medina, Morgan Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Cunningham v. Watts Guerra, LLP et al
as 5:2022cv00363
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Watts Guerra, LLP, Mikal C. Watts, Francisco Guerra, IV and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
