Cases 41 - 50 of 82
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PETTERS et al
as 2:2008mc00282
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
THOMAS JOSEPH PETTERS, DEANNA COLEMAN, ROBERT WHITE and others
Receiver:
DOUGLAS A. KELLEY
United States of America v. Petters et al
as 2:2008mc00144
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thomas Joseph Petters, Petters Company Inc, PCI and others
Receiver:
Douglas A. Kelley
United States of America v. Petters et al
as 6:2008mc00003
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thomas Joseph Petters, Deanna Coleman, Robert White and others
Receiver:
William Wassweiler
USA v. Peters et al
as 1:2008mc00251
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Thomas Joseph Peters, Petters Company, Inc., PCI and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type:
Other Statutes
USA v. Petters et al
as 4:2008mc00027
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Thomas Joseph Petters, Petters Company, Inc., PCI and others
United States of America v. Petters et al
as 1:2008mc00101
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thomas Joseph Petters, Deanna Coleman, Robert White and others
United States of America v. Petters et al
as 1:2008mc00045
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thomas Joseph Petters, Petters Company Inc., PCI, Petters Group Worldwide, LLC and others
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PETTERS et al
as 2:2008mc00185
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
THOMAS JOSEPH PETTERS, PETTERS COMPANY, INC., PCI and others
Cause Of Action: copy of Order from Another District Court
United States of America v. Petters et al
as 3:2008mc00118
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thomas Joseph Petters, Petters Company Inc., PCI and others
United States of America v. Petters et al
as 1:2008mc10289
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thomas Joseph Petters, Deanna Coleman, Robert White and others
Receiver:
Douglas A. Kelley
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
