Cases 81 - 90 of 412
Domingo Gomez, et al v. Joseph Biden, et al
as 20-5292
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Somya Arora, 20cv1906, K.G.S.M., 20cv2128, Mustafa Madazli, 20cv1926 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
J.M.A.A., (A MINOR) 20cv1856, Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jodi Lynn Karpes, Shipco Transport, Inc., Loida Phelps and others
Amicus Curiae:
Splunk Inc., State of California, Marisa S. Cianciarulo and others
Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al v. TMTE Inc et al
as 3:2020cv02910
Defendant:
TMTE Inc, Lucas Thomas Erb, Lucas Asher and others
Plaintiff:
Office of the Attorney General and State of Florida Office of Financial Regulation, State of Texas, State of Florida and others
Receiver:
Kelly Crawford
Respondent:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP and Bank of America NA
Petitioner:
Google, Portfolio Insider LLC and Carlos Cruz
Claimant:
Stephen Austin
Not Classified By Court:
Daniel Bruce Spitzer
State of California et al v. Council on Environmental Quality et al
as 3:2020cv06057
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Mary Neumayr and Council on Environmental Quality
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of California, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 20-16606
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, STATE OF TENNESSEE, STATE OF OHIO and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL SACKETT, Proposed Defendant-Intervenors and CHANTELL SACKETT
State of Washington et al v. Trump et al
as 1:2020cv03127
Plaintiff:
State of Colorado, State of Minnesota, State of Wisconsin and others
Defendant:
Donald J Trump, United States of America, Louis DeJoy and others
Amicus Curiae:
City of Seattle, Amici Curiae Brady and Team Enough, Amici Curiae Members of Congress and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
State of New York v. Trump
as 20-2630
Petitioner:
Howard County, American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, State of Colorado and others
Respondent:
Steven Dillingham, in his official capacity as Director of the United States Census Bureau, Donald J. Trump, United States Department of Commerce and others
State of New York et al v. Trump et al
as 1:2020cv05770
Plaintiff:
City of Seattle, State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Commerce, Wilbur L. Ross Jr., Steven Dillingham and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Make the Road New York, Casa, FIEL Houston Inc, ADC Research Institute and others
Amicus Curiae:
The League of Women Voters of the United States, 16 Businesses and Business Organizations, The League of Women Voters of California and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of California et al v. Wheeler et al
as 3:2020cv04869
Defendant:
andrew r. wheeler and united states environmental protection agency
Plaintiff:
state of north carolina, state of minnesota, state of maryland and others
Intervenor:
Montana, State of, Arkansas, State of, National Hydropower Association and others
Intervenor Defendant:
State of Texas, State of West Virginia, State of Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al v. EPA, et al
as 20-1265
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Andrew Wheeler, in his official capacity as Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner:
Erie County, State of New Jersey, State of Illinois and others
Connecticut et al v. Sandoz, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03539
Plaintiff:
State of New Mexico, State of Missouri, Commonwealth (of) Pennsylvania and others
Defendant:
MALLINCKRODT PLC, ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC, JOHN WESOLOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
