Cases 1 - 10 of 1,405
Bell v. Astru
as 24-339
Plaintiff:
SHARON-SHAWN A. BELL
Defendant:
M. ASTRU, current, SSA Hdqts Comm., LINDA DORM, Boston MA Comm. Rgl 1, PATRICK NIGGERD, Caseworker, (ne'gard) - FO #31 and others
Vazquez v. Standford
as 19-2945
Defendant / Appellee:
Samuel D. Roberts, Commissioner (SSI), Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, or other acting in their official capacity, David Stukowy, Commissioner of Human Resources and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jose Vazquez
Hassel v. Astrue
as 3:2017cv05811
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Hassel
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Garner v. United States Department of Defense et al
as 2:2017cv00459
Plaintiff:
Theresa Garner
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense, United States Department of Commerce, Social Security Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Pacetti v. Astrue
as 1:2015cv00451
Plaintiff:
Bartola J. Pacetti
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
R.J. Skye Foundation, LLC v. Rios, et al
as 5:2015cv00115
Defendant:
Rios, DEA Administator Michele M Leonhart, Geraldine Harris and others
Plaintiff:
R.J. Skye Foundation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Polonczyk v. Colvin et al
as 1:2014cv00327
Plaintiff:
Kim Anthony Polonczyk
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin, Michael J. Astrue and United States Department of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Stephen Yagman v. Brent Whittlesey, et al
as 14-55006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN YAGMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BRENT WHITTLESEY, LEON WARREN WEIDMAN, I, GEORGE S. CARDONA and others
Warren v. Astrue
as 13-2536
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gregory Warren
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael J. Astrue, Comissioner of Social Security Administration, in his individual and official capacities, Sheryll Ziporkin, Associate Commissioner of Social Security Administration, in her individual and official capacity and Social Security Administration
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
