Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Pendragon North America Automotive, Inc. Plan v. Lynissa Porter et al
as 8:2022cv01227
Plaintiff:
Pendragon North America Automotive, Inc. Plan
Defendant:
Lynissa Porter, Lisa Andrews Strawberry and The Estate of Nonleigh E. Porter Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Porter v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 4:2021cv01170
Plaintiff:
Terence E Porter
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
Melvin David Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Braidy Industries, Inc. et al v. Sealey
as 0:2020cv00106
Plaintiff:
Braidy Industries, Inc., Thomas Modrowski, Charles Price and others
Defendant:
Jaunique Sealey
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Brian Porter v. Douglas Fender
as 19-3443
Respondent / Appellee:
DOUGLAS FENDER, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRIAN E. PORTER
Crandall v. PTC Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10471
Plaintiff:
Matthew Crandall
Defendant:
PTC Inc. , James Heppelmann , Jeffrey Glidden and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Charles Porter
as 10-3438
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES E. PORTER
United States of America v. Porter
as 1:2010cv06068
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
James E. Porter
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Type:
Other Statutes
Wing, et al v. Asarco Incorporated, et al
as 3:1993cv05132
Plaintiff:
Eddie Sneed , Emma Sneed , Nicholas Riggio and others
Defendant:
Asarco Inc
Claimant:
Larry R Garrett
Movant:
John P Holland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613 Environmental Response, Compensation & Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
