Cases 1 - 10 of 397
Brown et al v. Permian Resources Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv00430
Defendant:
Permian Resources Corp., Exxon Mobil Corporation, Centennial Resource Development, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Brown, Abraham Drucker, Christopher Gallant and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Arjuna Capital, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Defendant:
Arjuna Capital, LLC and Follow This
Amicus Curiae:
The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Business Roundtable
Jefferson Parish v. Chevron
as 24-30031
Plaintiff:
Jefferson Parish and Louisiana State, ex rel, Parish of Jefferson
Intervenor:
Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management, Thomas F. Harris, Secretary and Louisiana State, ex rel, Jeff Landry, Attorney General
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A. Holdings, Incorporated, as successor in interest to Texaco E&P Inc. and Texaco Inc., Chevron USA, Incorporated, as successor in interest to The California Company, Atlantic Richfield Company, in its own capacity and as successor in interest to Acro Oil and Gas Company-Division of Atlantic Richfield and others
Plaquemines Parish v. Chevron
as 24-30032
Plaintiff:
Plaquemines Parish and Louisiana State, ex rel, Parish of Plaquemines
Intervenor:
Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris and Louisiana State, ex rel, Jeff Landry, Attorney General
Defendant:
Chevron USA, Incorporated, in its own capacity and as successor in interest to Chevron Oil Company and the California Company, Chevron USA Holdings, Incorporated, as successor in interest to Texaco E & P, Incorporated and Texaco, Incorporated, Texas Company and others
The Municipality of San Juan Puerto Rico v. Exxon Mobil Corp. et al
as 3:2023cv01608
Plaintiff:
The Municipality of San Juan Puerto Rico
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corp., Shell PLC F.K.A. Royal Dutch Shell PLC, Chevron Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Pacific Pipeline Company et al v. Santa Barbara County Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors
as 2:2023cv09218
Plaintiff:
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Petitioner:
Pacific Pipeline Company
Respondent:
Santa Barbara County Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
State of Maryland v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00459
Defendant:
Cumberland Farms, Inc., Shell Oil Products Company LLC, Chevron Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
State of Maryland
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. NL Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv11293
Counter Claimant:
Kinsbursky Bros. Supply, Inc., Trojan Battery Company, LLC, International Metals Ekco, Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Blount, Inc., Quemetco, Inc., Clarios, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
California Department of Toxic Substances Control and The Toxic Substances Control Account
3Rd Party Defendant:
O-I Glass Inc. f/k/a Owens-Illinois Inc, 12909 Cordary LLC, 20 20 08WYBO2 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
State of Rhode Island v. Atlantic Richfield Company et al
as 1:2017cv00204
Defendant:
Shell Petroleum, Inc., Valero Refining-Texas, L.P., CITGO Refining and Chemicals Company L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
Joshua Ebright, et al v. Alon USA Energy, Inc., et al
as 22-56018
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSHUA EBRIGHT, PAUL LEE and DAVID RINALDI, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant / Appellant:
ALON USA ENERGY, INC.
Defendant:
BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS, LLC, CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., TESORO REFINING & MARKETING COMPANY, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
