Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Torres v. Sher Tremonte LLP
as 24-1164
Plaintiff:
JOSE O. TORRES
Defendant:
SHER TREMONTE LLP, JUSTIN SHER, MICHAEL TREMONTE and others
SHER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00626
Petitioner:
AIMEE SHER
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
USA v. Thomas Sher
as 23-2337
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
THOMAS SHER
Jose Torres v. Sher Tremonte LLP, et al
as 23-1431
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE TORRES
Defendant / Appellee:
SHER TREMONTE LLP, JUSTIN M. SHER, MICHAEL TREMONTE and others
Defendant:
TOR B. EKELAND and JESSICA COONROD
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Winn Dixie Stores, et al v. Eastern Mushroom Marketing Cooperative, et al
as 22-2377
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WINN DIXIE STORES and BI LO HOLDING LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
EASTERN MUSHROOM MARKETING COOPERATIVE
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT A. FERANTO, JR., CARDILE MUSHROOMS INC, CARDILE BROTHERS MUSHROOMS PACKAGING and others
Defendant:
MD BASCIANI & SONS INC
TORRES v. SHER TREMONTE LLP et al
as 2:2022cv04662
Plaintiff:
JOSE O. TORRES
Defendant:
SHER TREMONTE LLP, JUSTIN M. SHER, MICHAEL TREMONTE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Moreland et al v. Sher Food Services Corp et al
as 1:2021cv01384
Plaintiff:
Alana Souza, Andra Cheri Moreland, Claudia Sampedro and others
Defendant:
Sher Food Services Corp doing business as Mist Restaurant & Lounge also known as Mist, Mist and Does 1 through 5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
