Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Cruz v. Reid-Anderson
as 24-10103
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dela Cruz, derivatievely on behalf of Nominal Defendant Six Flags Entertainment Corp
Defendant:
James Reid-Anderson, W. Marshall Barber, Richard W. Roedel and others
Dela Cruz v. Reid-Anderson et al
as 3:2023cv00396
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dela Cruz
Defendant:
James Reid-Anderson, W. Marshall Barber, Richard W Roedel and others
Clifton Marshall, et al v. Northrop Grumman Corporation, et al
as 20-56096
Defendant:
PRABU NATARAJAN, ERIC SCHOLTEN, CHRISTOPHER MCGEE and others
Appellee:
ALAN CARLSON, ROBERT STOLTE and PETER DELUCA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS W. HALL, MANUEL A. GONZALEZ, PHILLIP B. BROOKS and others
Other:
MICHAEL FRIEDLANDER and JOHN MURRAY
Plaintiff:
MARIA E. MIDKIFF
Randy Dingle v. Talmage Baggett
as 20-2041
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICIA ELLEN WATSON DINGLE, Individual, JASON L. HARRELL, Aent - Sheriff, DAVID E. MOORE, JR. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY DINGLE
Albayrak v. Reid-Anderson et al
as 4:2020cv00312
Defendant:
W. Marshall Barber, Nancy A. Krejsa, Kurt M. Cellar and others
Plaintiff:
Mehmet Ali Albayrak
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Schwartz v. Reid-Anderson et al
as 4:2020cv00262
Defendant:
W. Marshall Barber, Nancy A. Krejsa, Kurt M. Cellar and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Dingle v. Baggett et al
as 5:2019cv00425
Defendant:
Brenda Englis, Patricia Ellen Watson Dingle, Joseph A. Bledsoe, III and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Dingle
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Marshall v. Secretary of Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2017cv01382
Plaintiff:
James W. Marshall, Jr.
Defendant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services, Department of Health and Human Services and Inspector General and Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
