Cases 181 - 190 of 831,477
Wickstrom v. ACE American Insurance Company
as 5:2024cv05046
Plaintiff:
David Wickstrom
Defendant:
ACE American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
D.S. v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv11615
Plaintiff:
Jane Smith and D. S.
Defendant:
Michael Colotti, Nicholas Palmieri, Jennifer Pignone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY A/S/O LAJUANDA MYERS-BREWER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv01818
Plaintiff:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY A/S/O LAJUANDA MYERS-BREWER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
GIOVANNONE v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
as 2:2024cv07187
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND GIOVANNONE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Luther v. Ed French & Son, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Joshua G. Luther
Defendant:
Ed French & Son, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hollenbeck, Richard v. Hoy, Jared et al
as 3:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Hollenbeck
Defendant:
Jared Hoy, Chris S. Buesgen, Jamie Barker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kaur, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3852
Petitioner:
RAMANJIT KAUR, ANGREJ SINGH, PARNEET KAUR and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Singh, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3858
Petitioner:
DAYA SINGH, KIRATPAL KAUR KAUR and RANJEET SINGH SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02767
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Gray v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Matt S. Gray
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
