Cases 191 - 200 of 325
McKay et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04214
Plaintiff:
Jane C. McKay and Rodrick L. McKay
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCKAY et al v. FOGEL et al
as 2:2015cv04755
Plaintiff:
ELISA MCKAY and EDWARD MCKAY
Defendant:
EMILY M. FOGEL and ROBERT FOGEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Green v. Lemky-Spence et al
as 2:2015cv02614
Plaintiff:
Shawna A Green
Defendant:
Brenda Lemky-Spence , Terra Gailfus , Jay Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
McKay v. Abad et al
as 2:2015cv02367
Plaintiff:
Amanda McKay
Defendant:
Maria Mylene Fabia Abad and Sun Life Center for Women & Children Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McKay v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv13760
Plaintiff:
Joan McKay
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McKay v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc
as 3:2015cv02967
Plaintiff:
Julia McKay
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCKAY v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv05435
Plaintiff:
GREGORY MCKAY
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McKay v. Knoerzer et al
as 3:2015cv02347
Plaintiff:
John Douglas McKay
Defendant:
Michael Anthony Knoerzer and Clyde & Co LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McKay v. United States of America et al
as 2:2015cv01496
Plaintiff:
Albert McKay, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America, Sandra Turner and Sherell Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2401 Federal Tort Claims Act
Littleton et al v. Axiall Corp et al
as 2:2015cv00287
Plaintiff:
Muriel Littleton , Clarence Malveaux, Jr , Archie McKay and others
Defendant:
Axiall Corp and John Manns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
