Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Phifer et al v. Monsanto Company
as 2:2017cv02283
Plaintiff:
Che Phifer and Don Phifer
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Che v. Chang et al
as 8:2016cv02665
Plaintiff:
Li Che
Defendant:
Hsien Cheng Chang and Wasserman, Mancini & Chang, PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lowrimore v. Cao et al
as 6:2015cv00348
Plaintiff:
Leslie D. Lowrimore
Defendant:
Hai Cao , ATL Transport, LLC and Con Che
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gillispie v. United Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 6:2015cv00128
Plaintiff:
Raymond Gillispie
Defendant:
United Specialty Insurance Company and Con Che
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Setareh-Shenasv. Ches
as 2:2015cv01793
Defendant:
Matthew S. Ches
Plaintiff:
Ghodis Setareh-Shenas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Setareh-Shenas
as 1:2015cv01793
Defendant:
Matthew S Ches
Plaintiff:
Ghodis Setareh-Shenas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Bedward v. Bovell-Aguilar et al
as 1:2015cv00953
Plaintiff:
Che Bedward
Defendant:
Izabel J Bovell-Aguilar, The United States Postal Service and The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
LaCava et al v. Paloma Industries of Nagoya, Japan et al
as 1:2013cv01365
Plaintiff:
Sara Arrington LaCava , Matthew B. Arrington and Estate of Susan K. Arrington
Defendant:
Paloma Industries of Nagoya, Japan, Rheem Manufacturing Company, Emerson Electric Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zuniga et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv23208
Plaintiff:
Monica Zuniga and Che Zuniga
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBINSON et al v. MENARD, INC.
as 1:2013cv00647
Plaintiff:
CHE CAMERON, JENNIFER JONES, B. R. and others
Defendant:
MENARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
