Cases 21 - 30 of 78
Davis v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv07738
Plaintiff:
Linda Davis
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv01402
Plaintiff:
Linda Davis
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv01773
Plaintiff:
Linda Davis
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilcox et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00753
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH
Plaintiff:
Wilcox, Robert Wilcox, David Adkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DAVIS et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 1:2016cv00069
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Plaintiff:
DAVIS, LINDA DAVIS and PAUL DUNTON
Petitioner:
CITY OF BANGOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Davis et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01153
Plaintiff:
Linda Davis and Jason Davis
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hamilton v. Boyd, et al
as 15-1460
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAN B. HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES B. BOYD, Judge, PAUL METZGER, Judge, ERIN ELY, Judge and others
Hamilton v. Boyd, et al
as 15-1401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAN BARTON HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES B. BOYD, Judge, PAUL METZGER, Judge, ERIN ELY, Judge and others
Davis et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv13898
Plaintiff:
Linda Davis and Roger Davis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis-Bill v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2015cv03585
Plaintiff:
Linda Davis-Bill
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
