Cases 31 - 40 of 95
Smith v. Army Corps of Engineers
as 3:2017cv00385
Plaintiff:
Tammy Smith
Defendant:
U S Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Burke v. United States of America et al
as 5:2016cv00175
Plaintiff:
James C. Burke
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1916
Robert Dallas v. United States of America
as 16-31046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT DALLAS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, as the United States Army Corps of Enginers
Villarreal v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2016cv21105
Defendant:
United States Of America, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Southwind Construction Corps
Plaintiff:
Maria P. Villarreal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Swindoll v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
as 3:2015cv00184
Plaintiff:
Barney Swindoll
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Chino Binamo v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2015cv07940
Plaintiff:
Chino Binamo
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Does and United States Army Corps of Engineers
Teresa Ford v. US
as 15-1729
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERESA FORD
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MIRIAM FLEMING, TERRY RAMSEY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Chad Blanchard, et al v. USA
as 14-31295
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHAD BLANCHARD
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, on behalf of United States Army Corps of Engineers
Defendant - Appellee:
STALLION OILFIELD SERIVCE, LIMITED
Rosario-Fabregas v U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
as 3:2014cv01584
Plaintiff:
Jose E. Rosario-Fabregas
Defendant:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LAROCCA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv00467
Plaintiff:
WILMA LAROCCA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and AMHERST MADISON, INC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 741
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
